![]() The fact that the plot is only based on Jennifer's point of view also stops the player from seeing all sides of the story as well. That year, despite the sport’s commissioner saying Qualcomm Stadium was too outdated to host another Super Bowl, Michaels said the game should “move here permanently.The plot of Rule of Rose focuses on a nineteen-year old orphan named Jennifer as she recovers the forgotten memories of her childhood and remembers the people she knew at the Rose Garden Orphanage.īecause the plot is based on Jennifer's memories alone, what really happened is not always obvious to the player due to the fact that Jennifer's memory can alter or distort events and dates. That praise pales compared to the love Michaels showed San Diego in 2003. ![]() ![]() “Things worked out really, really well,” Michaels said at one point. There’s no magic to how many mentions or images might boost a city’s image, but Indianapolis was mentioned or shown 20 times on TV following the coin toss, Nienstedt said. ![]() “You wouldn’t even know if you went back to the tape in Houston and Jacksonville that there was a city, that we weren’t in some kind of virtual reality because the city was barely even mentioned in both Houston’s and Jacksonville’s case.” “The reason we saw a big jump up was because it was a beautiful, sunny, warm afternoon, and John Madden reinforced that with his broadcasting,” Nienstedt said. So why did San Diego get an image boost in 2003 - up 8 percentage points among Super Bowl viewers and 6 percentage points among all Americans? “What we’ve proven conclusively is that what you do on the national stage is up to things partially in your control but a lot of things are outside your control.” “You hear quite a bit that you’re not just going to get the hundreds of millions of dollars that people spend when they come to the game, you’re going to get a lot of free advertising because you’re on going to be on this national stage,” Nienstedt said. The poll’s purpose? To probe whether the big game amounts to big advertising for a city, which can translate into more tourism and economic development. It has a 3 to 4 percent margin of error.Īs in prior years, Nienstedt said he combined the poll with a client’s survey to defray its cost. His new survey, released Thursday, randomly polled about 1,000 Americans by telephone, half over four days during the week leading up to the Super Bowl and half in the three days after the game. He said he was too busy to poll during the 2008 election cycle when the game was in Glendale, Ariz. Since 2003, he has done the survey every year but one. Only a soggy Miami in 2007 and a snowy Arlington, Texas, in 2011 saw declines in their nationwide perception.īeyond weather, a city’s image can be affected by tourist spots, civic monuments and stadium settings often shot aerially during the game, Nienstedt said. In 10 years of Nienstedt’s polling, only two cities - San Diego in 2003 and Tampa, Fla., in 2009 - boosted their image. “You’re kind of rolling the dice when you host the Super Bowl and you’re looking at how your image is going to be portrayed across the country,” Nienstedt said. It’s the same effect he has estimated the Super Bowl had on the host cities of Houston in 2004, Jacksonville, Fla., in 2005, Detroit in 2006 and Miami in 2010. That’s the effect he said the game had on America’s impression of Indianapolis. He counted eight and seven, respectively, then he calculated a third number: Zero. The president of Competitive Edge Research & Communication tallied all the televised images of Indianapolis and all the times announcer Al Michaels mentioned the host city. As a record 111.3 million Americans watched the Super Bowl on TV last Sunday, San Diego pollster John Nienstedt crunched something other than chips.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |